Skip to main content
    Client and partner teams planning delivery priorities together

    Managed Data Teams

    Specialist data capability, available for as long as you need it.

    Data and AI work doesn’t stop when a project ends. Priorities change, new requirements emerge and the specialist skills you need will change with them. A managed data team gives you continuity and access to the right expertise without having to recruit every capability in-house.

    If you have a Data and AI roadmap to deliver but don’t have all the skills or capacity you need in-house, a Managed Data Team fills those gaps without the stop-start of separate engagements.

    You get a multidisciplinary team assembled around your objectives, delivering inside your process, flexing as priorities change, and building capability in your people as it goes.

    Free. 30 minutes. Directly with our founder, Inez Hogarth. No pitch.

    Rated 5.0 on Clutch by the organisations we work with

    Common challenges

    Why organisations move to an ongoing team.

    Data and AI work rarely stands still. Priorities change, different skills are needed and internal teams only have so much capacity. These are some of the reasons organisations choose to work with us on an ongoing basis.

    01

    Specialist data roles are difficult to recruit and hold

    Data engineers, analytics engineers and AI specialists are competitive to hire, and a single vacancy can hold up a roadmap for months. Smaller data functions also struggle to offer the variety and progression these people look for.

    02

    Your Data and AI needs don’t stand still.

    Platforms, pipelines, reporting and models need ongoing attention. A project-by-project approach can make it difficult to maintain continuity and momentum.

    03

    One person carries too much of the knowledge

    A single engineer or analyst understands how the critical pipelines and reports work. That concentration of knowledge is a genuine operational risk and it limits how quickly anything can change.

    04

    Consultancy delivery leaves nothing behind

    Work is delivered to a specification and the team departs. The organisation is left with an estate it did not build, cannot easily extend and does not fully understand.

    05

    Demand is uneven across the year

    A migration, a regulatory deadline or a reporting cycle creates a peak that a fixed team cannot absorb, followed by quieter periods where permanent headcount is underused.

    06

    The internal team spends its time keeping the lights on

    Skilled people are consumed by support, refreshes and ad hoc requests. There is no capacity left for the platform, governance or AI work the organisation has committed to.

    Our approach

    A team built around your objectives.

    We use our Unearth, Reveal, Build, Achieve engagement model to establish the team, then keep reviewing it. Our DIAlog framework helps us understand how your organisation actually works, which is what allows an external team to become genuinely integrated.

    Managed data team, defined

    A managed data team is an ongoing, multidisciplinary team assembled and led by a specialist partner to deliver an organisation’s data and AI roadmap alongside its internal people. It is accountable for agreed outcomes rather than filled seats, integrates into the client’s delivery process, flexes as priorities change, and transfers knowledge and standards into the internal team as it works.

    1. Stage 01

      Unearth

      We start with your objectives and the roadmap the team has to deliver, then look honestly at current capability, workload and the gaps. We agree what should sit with your permanent team, what we should cover, and the outcomes the team will be measured against.

    2. Stage 02

      Reveal

      We share what we found and agree the shape of the team with you, rather than offering a standard pod. That means the mix of skills required, engineering, analytics, AI, governance and leadership, the level of seniority, the working model, ways of working alongside your people, and how the arrangement flexes as priorities change.

    3. Stage 03

      Build

      The team delivers inside your delivery process with a visible backlog, agreed ceremonies and regular reporting on progress and value. Our people work alongside yours rather than in parallel, and knowledge transfer is designed into the work through pairing, documentation and shared standards.

    4. Stage 04

      Achieve

      We review the arrangement at agreed intervals: what has been delivered, how capability inside your team has grown, and whether the shape of the team is still right. Where you want to bring work in house, we plan the transition deliberately rather than leaving it to chance.

    Business outcomes

    What changes as a result.

    We describe outcomes in the terms our clients use about the work.

    Specialist capability without a hiring cycle

    Access to engineering, analytics, AI and governance skills at the point the roadmap needs them rather than when recruitment allows.

    Resourcing that flexes with priorities

    Scale the team up for a migration or a deadline, and adjust the mix as work moves from platform build to analytics or governance.

    Continuity across the roadmap

    The same team carries context between phases, which removes the restart cost that comes with sequential project procurement.

    Capability building inside your team

    Pairing, documentation and shared standards mean your people grow through the engagement rather than watching it happen.

    A partnership rather than a transaction

    Senior involvement, honest reporting on progress and a relationship our clients describe as collaborative rather than supplier led.

    Reduced delivery risk

    Knowledge is documented and shared across the team, so critical pipelines and reporting no longer depend on one individual.

    Relevant client work

    Evidence from long term client relationships.

    The case studies set out what the organisation needed, what we delivered and what it produced.

    The sense of partnership. At no point did it feel like a purely transactional relationship.

    Michael Gardiner

    AI Innovation Lead, South of Scotland Enterprise

    They provided costed structure and solutions to create an ongoing credible data management capability.
    Graham McDougall, Head of Subscriptions, DC Thomson
    Data Understood push to learn the nuances of the company, its overall strategy, its people and thus deliver solutions that benefit the company to its core and lay the foundation for a strong future in data.
    Anup Purewal, Chief Data Officer, DC Thomson

    Where to go next

    Related services, sectors and reading.

    Managed teams usually deliver the work the other services define. The sector context shapes the skills mix, the security requirements and the pace of delivery.

    Buying questions

    Managed data teams: questions enterprise buyers ask.

    Written for the people who have to compare this against recruitment, contractors and project consultancy, covering how the model works in practice.

    A managed data team is an ongoing, multidisciplinary team assembled and led by a specialist partner to deliver an organisation’s data and AI roadmap alongside its internal people. It differs from staff augmentation because the team is accountable for outcomes rather than filling seats, and it differs from project consultancy because the engagement is continuous and capability transfer is part of the arrangement.

    Recruitment gives you long term ownership and is the right answer for roles that are core and stable. A managed team gives you access to a broader mix of skills sooner, absorbs peaks in demand, and removes the risk of a single vacancy stalling delivery. Many clients run both: a permanent core supported by managed capability for specialist and variable work.

    Contractors are individuals you manage and are responsible for directing, developing and replacing. A managed team arrives with its own leadership, standards, quality process and shared knowledge, and is accountable for agreed outcomes. If someone rotates out, the team retains the context rather than you rebuilding it.

    Typically data engineers, analytics engineers, analysts, AI and machine learning specialists, and governance and data quality expertise, with senior technical leadership and delivery management. The mix is set by your roadmap and adjusted as priorities move from platform build through analytics to governance or AI.

    Inside your delivery process, not beside it. We use your tooling and standards where they exist, contribute to the same backlog, join the same ceremonies and review code together. Where standards are missing we propose them and document them so they remain useful after we step back.

    Engagements are usually a monthly arrangement based on the agreed team shape, with a defined term and review points. Costs are known in advance and change only when you choose to change the shape of the team. We set out notice and flexibility terms clearly at the start, because the model only works if you can adjust it.

    Long enough for the team to build context and deliver something meaningful, which in practice means several months rather than weeks. Very short arrangements tend to spend most of their value on onboarding. Where you want to test the working relationship first, a defined initial phase with a clear deliverable is a reasonable starting point.

    Pairing between our engineers and yours, documentation and run books produced as part of delivery rather than at the end, shared code standards, and regular sessions where our specialists teach rather than deliver. We also report on capability growth alongside delivery progress, so it stays a visible objective.

    Against the outcomes agreed at the start: roadmap delivery, reliability of the platform and reporting, reduction in manual effort, and growth in your team’s ability to do the work. We review these at agreed intervals and expect the shape of the team to change as a result.

    Buying capacity without agreeing outcomes. Keeping the team at arm’s length from the business so context never develops. Leaving knowledge transfer to goodwill instead of designing it in. Not appointing an internal owner for the relationship. And treating the arrangement as permanent rather than reviewing it as internal capability grows.

    Yes, and separating the two matters. We agree what is support, what is delivery and how much of the team’s time each should consume, so improvement work does not quietly disappear into keeping the lights on.

    Yes. We are based in Dundee and work with ambitious organisations across Scotland and the UK. Managed teams work largely remotely with regular onsite time for planning, workshops and relationship building, and we agree that pattern with you at the outset.

    Let's talk about your Data & AI priorities.

    Whether you're developing a data strategy, modernising your data platform, preparing for AI or tackling a specific business challenge, start with a 30-minute conversation with Inez.

    Free. 30 minutes. Directly with Inez. No pitch.